Tag Archives: Giglio v United States

TFS Writers discuss #Blacklivesmatter and wonder is brutality State Sponsored Terrorism?

Posted on November 28, 2015 by Susan Chandler

Originally posted on The Florida Squeeze:
By The All-Nite Images from NY, NY, USA (Black Lives Matter Black Friday) The Black Lives Matter movement as well as a more vigilant media has raised awareness of law enforcement brutality towards African-Americans.…

Posted in #ColorOfLaw, #DomesticTerrorism, #JudicialMisconduct, #MaliciousProsecution, absolute immunity from prosecution, Connick v Thompson, Harry Connick Sr, Uncategorized | Tagged #BlackLivesMatter, #PlannedParenthood, Brady v Maryland, Connick v Thompson, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, SCOTUS, US Supreme Court, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | Leave a comment

Whiny cops paid $4m for “discrimination”; exoneree paid $1m for 39 years of his life

Posted on April 4, 2015 by Susan Chandler

Wrongly jailed since ’75 = $1 million settlement while police who got desk duty get $4 million A 12-year-old boy who later admitted to making his entire testimony up was the only evidence linking Ricky Jackson to the murder of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged American Bar Association, Brady v Maryland, coerced witness testimony, Connick v Thompson, exoneration compensation, Giglio v United States, Harry Connick Sr, Imbler v Pachtman, IRS Oversight Board, John Thompson, Justice Department, police misconduct, prosecutorial malice, relief and redress, Ricky Jackson, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, TIGTA complaint no. 55-1106-0136-C, Treasury Department, Van de Kamp v Godstein | 3 Comments

Bar associations can’t be allowed to continue law enforcement role

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Susan Chandler

State Bar denies grievance against DA | Amarillo Globe-News The State Bar of Texas has denied an Austin-based group’s grievance against Randall County Criminal District Attorney James Farren, rejecting claims that he concealed evidence, coerced testimony and threatened key prosecution … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Blue Shield, Connick v Thompson, Giglio v United States, Harry Connick Sr, Imbler v Pachtman, IRS Oversight Board, James Farren, John Thompson, Plessy v Ferguson, State Bar of Texas, Texas Coalition on Lawyer Accountability, TIGTA complaint no. 55-1106-0136-C, Treasury Department, Van de Kamp v Goldstein, void tax exemption | Leave a comment

F*cking nuts American Bar Association is incapable of SCOTUS assigned responsibilities

Posted on March 27, 2015 by Susan Chandler

Glenn Ford Exonerated After Spending 30 YEARS On Louisiana Death Row – Published on Mar 14, 2014 Prosecutor: I was ‘arrogant, judgmental, narcissistic’ in capital prosecution of now-exonerated man “As a young 33-year-old prosecutor,” Stroud wrote, “I was not capable … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged A M Stroud JR, ABA, American Bar Association, Brady v Maryland, civil immunities, Connick v Thompson, fraudulent tax exemption, Giglio v United States, Glenn Ford, Imbler v Pachtman, IRS Oversight Board, malicious prosecution, Marty Stroud, TIGTA complaint no. 55-1106-0136-C, Treasury Department, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | 2 Comments

Apology Lite: prosecutor wants taxpayers to pay for his “mistakes”

Posted on March 25, 2015 by Susan Chandler

Glenn Ford Exonerated After Spending 30 YEARS On Louisiana Death Row – Published on Mar 14, 2014 —————————————– Lead prosecutor apologizes for role in sending Glenn Ford to death row I apologize to Glenn Ford for all the misery I … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged absolute immunity for deliberate misconduct, American Bar Association, Brady v Maryland, Connick v Thompson, fraudulent tax exemptions, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, IRS Oversight Board, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | Leave a comment

Get well quickly, Justice Ginsberg; we need your rocking dissents.

Posted on November 26, 2014 by Susan Chandler

For Immediate Release For Further Information Contact: November 26, 2014 Kathleen Arberg (202) 479-3211 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg underwent a coronary catheterization procedure this morning at MedStar Heart & Vascular Institute at MedStar Washington Hospital Center to place a stent … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged absolute immunity for deliberate misconduct, Brady v Maryland, Connick v Thompson, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, prosecutorial misconduct, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | Leave a comment

.@BostonGlobe misleads the pubic re prosecutorial misconduct

Posted on October 21, 2014 by Susan Chandler

Bernard Baran case raises larger question: Should prosecutors answer for their actions? – Editorials – The Boston Globe The death of Baran last month, at the age of 49, has brought renewed attention to the travesty of his trial and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged American Bar Association, Bernard Baran, Brady v Maryland, Connick v Thompson, frame-ups, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, judicial misconduct, malicious prosecutions, prosecutorial misconduct, The Boston Globe | Leave a comment

Exonerations continue to rip-off taxpayers …

Posted on September 25, 2014 by Susan Chandler

Judge Approves $10 Million Wrongful Conviction Deal | New York Law Journal A federal judge has signed off on a $10 million settlement between Jabbar Collins and New York City, a pact that will award the wrongfully convicted man’s attorney … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged absolute immunity for misconduct, American Bar Association, Brady v Maryland, Brooklyn, Connick v Thompson, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, impeach, Joel Rudin, John Roberts, malicious prosecution, New York Bar Association, New York Law Journal, prosecutorial misconduct, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | Leave a comment

What Thurgood Marshall would most likely say about our justice system

Posted on August 5, 2014 by Susan Chandler

The Marshall Project The Marshall Project is a not-for-profit, non-partisan news organization dedicated to covering America’s criminal justice system … Our name is an homage to Supreme Court justice and crusading civil rights attorney Thurgood Marshall. via The Marshall … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged American Bar Association, Brady v Maryland, Connick v Thompson, Giglio v United States, Imbler v Pachtman, impeachment, Innocence Industry, IRS Oversight Board, Justice Department, peer review, The Marshall Project, Thurgood Marshall, Van de Kamp v Goldstein | Leave a comment