My Christmas wish was for dishonest reporters to quit their day jobs, Part 1

When Prosecutors Are ‘Innocence Deniers’ : NPR

… they [prosecutors] don’t simply oppose a wrongful conviction claim – because some claims are bogus or murky and they have to be investigated. Instead, when confronted with overwhelming evidence that the person is innocent, they refuse to let go of the conviction, and they will fight for years through the appellate courts. They will publicly declare their belief that the person is guilty.

Source: When Prosecutors Are ‘Innocence Deniers’ : NPR

Despite the quoted kernel of truth that begins to explain the mindset of the majority of prosecutors nationwide – a mindset apparently fully endorsed by national, state and local Bar associations – this NPR interview is too deeply dishonest to be worth listening to: now that the young and vulnerable Davontae Sanford has been freed, Detroit hit man Vincent Smothers has made another credible confession in an attempt to free yet another innocent serving some of his time … which neither the NPR interviewer nor the Slate contributor/University of San Francisco School of Law professor interviewee spoke of.

The most thorough reporting of  Vincent’s efforts to free Thelonious Searcy has been from Voice of Detroit. I blogged about that coverage in July of last year, adding details that real reporters would have dug into the minute they first learned that Vincent Smothers was trying to free Davontae Sanford, including these:

Davontae didn’t want to plead guilty in court; he did so because his mother asked him to, on the advise of incredibly sleazy attorney Robert Slameka.

Over the years of his incarceration and during his exoneration, Davontae’s story was covered by the Detroit media and by the national media. Not one reporter mentioned that an Amy Slameka worked in the prosecutors office, and that she had pull with the Bar.

Robert Slameka should have been long gone many times over via permanent disbarment by the Bar for behaviors like publicly declaring that his Eddie Joe Lloyd – whom Slameka was representing on appeal – was guilty, which didn’t happen to be true. Eddie was subsequently DNA-exonerated of the rape-homicide he was convicted of.

Innocence has morphed from an industry to an industrial complex … hordes of professional organizations are now making serious money – often in the form of Bar or federal grants – from pretending to pull out all the stops in an effort to make sure only criminals serve time.

This isn’t how our justice system is supposed to work.

When officers, prosecutors, judges and justices act under Color of Law rather than by Rule of Law, the FBI is supposed to investigate and seek indictments of every last one of them from the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice is supposed to indict and prosecute each and every offender.

In short, according to the laws of our land, not even one Innocence non-profit organization is necessary to rid us of the likes of Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy, who has the gall to use her inexcusably belated interest in untested rape kits to cover for her greater interest in keeping innocents framed.

All that is required for justice to be readily available – no non-profit required – is for the FBI and the Department of Justice not to cherry pick which responsibilities they wish to embrace.

Innocence attorneys made a boatload of money from Eddie Joe Lloyd’s exoneration, a Kym Worthy/Amy Slameka/Robert Slameka/coerced confession circus. I don’t know if attorneys are cashing in on Davontae Sanford’s much more modest recent settlement of his Kym Worthy/Amy Slameka/Robert Slameka/coerced confession circus … I sincerely hope they’re too afraid to.

Afraid of the Voice of Detroit, afraid of me, and particularly afraid of all of you.

Thelonious Searcy

Thelonious Searcy

About Susan Chandler

Now-disabled interior/exterior designer dragged into battling conviction corruption from its periphery in a third personal battle with civil public corruption.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to My Christmas wish was for dishonest reporters to quit their day jobs, Part 1

  1. sandra olson says:

    as to the prosecutors unwillingness to let go of a conviction even when it has been proven to be wrong. I put forward another idea on why they refuse to accept that they were wrong. These people are very arrogant,, and under the impression that NOTHING they do is EVER wrong. Other people are wrong, the evidence is wrong,, they,,, are NEVER wrong. and with this overwhelming determination to resist the truth,, not much seeps in. Including common sense.


    • Thank you for commenting on the prosecutorial arrogance factor, Sandra; I know how hard it is for incarcerated innocents and their families to bear that horrific additional insult. Good reporters take arrogant, corrupt public servants apart in short order, but our mainstream media – dominated by a handful of billionaires – isn’t hiring good reporters right now … it better serves their predatory corporate agendas to have arrogant, corrupt public servants at every level of government. Part of the Department of Justice’s job was to ensure that our mainstream media couldn’t be controlled by just a handful of agenda-laden billionaires. It’s failed us in so many ways.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.