Bite mark “evidence” more reliable than DNA? Since when??

Posted on April 21, 2014 by Susan Chandler

Douglas Prade, Freed After 15 Years In Prison, Sent Back Behind Bars

Prade was freed when a judge decided new DNA testing of a bite mark proved he didn’t kill his ex-wife. But the appeals court concluded that the test didn’t give a clear answer.

via Douglas Prade, Freed After 15 Years In Prison, Sent Back Behind Bars.

——————————–

There have been multiple DNA exoneration that prove that bite mark evidence isn’t reliable at all … it simply isn’t credible for an appeals court to be ignorant of the exonerations.

About Susan Chandler

Now-disabled interior/exterior designer dragged into battling conviction corruption from its periphery in a third personal battle with civil public corruption.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.