Needelman needles me back … part deux

When first needled by Needelman’s office, I was unaware that the 5.5-year-old, unsubstantied debt PennCredit was engaged to collect from me had been marked up 40%. There may be no other Florida court clerks engaging in usurious debt collection with election-affecting timing, there may be many. I hope – this once – that the Justice Department heeds my correspondence, and finds even one to be one too many.

From: Susan Chandler
Date: June 27, 2012 4:51:16 PM EDT
To: Mitch.Needelman@brevardclerk.us
Cc: inquiries@penncredit.com, Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com, FL_GOV Inspector General , Tampa Division , miami@ic.fbi.gov, ASKDOJ , darren_achord@rubio.senate.gov, jennifer_solomon@billnelson.senate.gov, Senator Mike Haridopolos , Speaker Cannon , mreed@floridatoday.com
Subject: Notice of Collection from PennCredit collection, addressed to Susan Schoof

The Honorable Mitch Needelman
Brevard County Clerk of the Court
700 S Park Avenue
Titusville, FL 32780-4015

Dear Mr. Needelman,

I am writing in response to Ms. McGrory email of June 19th and Ms. Nix email of June 20th, in further protest of alleged indebtedness of $140. I maintain that I owe nothing.

Ms. Nix email attempted to establish 5.5-year-old indebtedness through a narrative, making no explanation of what legal authority allows a usurious 40% markup. She indicated that this anything-but-established debt would be hostilely pursued under a no-longer-legal name, which does not obligate the post office to achieve delivery.

As previously addressed, as a result of the Legislature’s temporary backdoor tax on vulnerable populations via a punitive $50 fee to declare indigence, the case record resoundingly reflects that I received no legitimate court services in connection with fees I paid in good faith to the Brevard County Clerk of Court, as the trier-of-fact was Judge John Dean Moxley, whose untenable trial behaviors date back to his framing innocents with charlatan dog handler John Preston in the early 1980’s, which only partly reveal his lawlessness, as you well know.

In that regard, I addressed, stamped and mailed two letters to Florida Supreme Court Justice Fred Lewis in his proper legal name in the autumn of 2006 … and therefore have every reason to believe that the post office achieved delivery of both. The original – if memory serves – was dated October 26. The second one sent – again if memory serves – had my handwritten “Second Request” added to the top of the letter. That second copy appears below the pdf of “Legal foes differ on dog’s nose.” It requests emergency relief for being denied reasonable expectations from two Florida courts under state and federal laws:
1. Expectation of having safe, uninterrupted possession of one’s home, papers, and personal possessions is reasonable under the 14th Amendment.

2. Expectation of being protected from undue stress, when afflicted by a stress disorder, is reasonable under the ADA.

3. Expectation of being protected from theft, perjury, obstruction, abuse of process and deliberate duress is reasonable under existing Florida statutes.

4. Expectation of equitable distribution of martial assets is reasonable under existing Florida statutes.

5. Expectation of attorney candor before the Court is reasonable under Florida Bar Ethics Codes.

6. Expectation of candor from the Court is reasonable under Florida Judicial Canons.

Not one of those reasonable expectations has been delivered upon to date. Over and above the court fees I paid, each penny I pay in Florida sales tax is a fresh fraud upon me. I am in no way unique … Brevard may well prove to have our nation’s most corrupt courts. In eight years of innocence advocacy, I haven’t occasioned upon any other county in the U.S. with as many knowingly-clouded convictions.

It occurs to me that there may be more to your office’s sudden interest in “collecting” than possible retaliation for my confronting you over you temporarily burying Gary Bennett’s record, as previously addressed. If your office is badgering a great number of people who owe little or nothing from so long ago that they’ve retained no proof of payment (many of whom may have never owed anything but for the temporary $50 fee to declare indigence), it may be all about keeping likely Democrats from the polls, which a 40% markup would certainly help achieve.

Printed on PennCredit’s Notice of Collection: “PLEASE NOTE only if your license has been suspended: After your payment of the amount due has been processed by the Brevard County Clerk of Court, you must go to either the Brevard County Clerk of Court’s Office or your local Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Office and pay any applicable fees to have your license reinstated. You are responsible for the reinstatemt of your license or driving privileges.”

No valid license means no valid picture ID … no valid picture ID means a great deal of difficulty voting. As you know, Governor Scott destroyed Governor Crist’s semi-automated parole process. Rights restoration now requires a Jim Crow five-year minimum, and will keep perhaps keep a thousand or more Democrats away from the polls – with Floridians footing the bill for the monumental, entirely unnecessary accounting costs. Only two other states make rights restoration such a ridiculous, race-biased process … both Southern. Scott is also engaged in a “voter purge” that many election supervisors and the Justice Department find to be baseless. Related suits will again be at a ridiculous cost to Floridians.

It is up to the Justice Department to discover if there is a pattern of Florida court clerks – immediately before an election – making it exceedingly difficult for their cash-strapped constituents (who typically vote Democratic) to have valid picture ID by the first Tuesday in November.

A Google search of “county clerk collection FL” seems to suggest there is (link below).

My copying PennCredit serves to notify them that your office is attempting to solicit dishonestly assessed debt from 5.5 years ago, substantiated only with a narrative, unconscionably marked-up by 40%, under a no-longer-legal name, all in what may be yet another prong of a concerted, unethical effort to keep Democrats away from the polls in November. It is my hope that PennCredit’s Mission Statement and Vision Statement mean a great deal to them, and that I will hear from them very soon.

Your selection of non-local enterprises for debt collection and employee leasing made it all more likely that legitimate debt owed the court will remain uncollected, Mr. Needelman … having a job is key to satisfying one’s debt obligations. And eating. And keeping a roof over one’s head. And remaining a law-abiding citizen, according to Indian River County Sheriff Loar. In a speech before local Democrats, Loar illustrated his point of unemployment causing increases in first-time crime with an accounting of the arrest of a formerly upstanding citizen for attempting to steal a cart of groceries for his family. According to Google, in-county debt collection enterprises include Associated Credit and Collection on Eyster Boulevard in Rockledge and Advanced Collection Bureau on Cogswell Street in Rockledge, and in-county employee leasing enterprises include First Financial Employee Leasing on Minton Road in Palm Bay and The Job Place, Inc on Julia Street in Titusville.

You would best serve Brevard by taking your name off the ballot, sir.

Sincerely,

Susan Chandler
3008 N 25th St
Ft Pierce, FL 34946

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=county+clerk+collection+notice&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=county+clerk+collection+agency+FL&oq=county+clerk+collection+agency+FL&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3…539749.548747.1.549244.27.18.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0…0.0.y1vr6CO6zpo&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=fb84fe62abac3a2d&biw=1233&bih=631

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root. ~ Henry David Thoreau

From: “Summer Nix”
Date: June 20, 2012 3:27:48 PM EDT
To: “Mitch Needelman” ,
Cc: , “FL_GOV Inspector General” , “Tampa Division” , , “ASKDOJ” , , , “Charlene Amos” , “Kim Booth” , “Aetna Brannen”
Subject: RE: Notice of Collection from PennCredit collection, addressed to Susan Schoof

Good afternoon Ms. Susan Chandler,

I have researched your case 05-2004-DR-006668-XXXX-XX and I am showing a balance of $100.00, not including the collection fee.

On 10/26/2006 a Motion to Hear Respondents Second Emergency Motion for Civil Contempt/Enforcement Attorney Sanctions and Other Relief Ex Parte was filed via facsimile by Susan Chandler at 321 Monarch Lane Fort Pierce FL 34946, which a reopen filing fee was assessed. A notice of payment due of $50.00 was mailed out on 10/31/2006 to the same address mentioned above.

On 12/13/2006 a Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Relief was filed by Susan Adeline Chandler at 2703 N Federal Hwy Fort Pierce FL 34946, which a reopen filing fee was assessed. A notice of payment due of $50.00 was mailed out on 12/13/2006 to the same address mentioned above.

These notices never came back to us undeliverable.

We did receive a change of address via facsimile on 11/19/2007 and then another change of address via facsimile on 04/14/2010. Since the notices mailed on 10/31/2006 and 12/13/2006 were not returned to us, we took no further action when we received the subsequent change of addresses.

The case was filed under T J Schoof vs S A Schoof and the names will remain as per the original filing.

If you need any additional information, please let me know.

Thank you,

Summer Nix
Compliance & Collections
Office of Mitch Needelman
Brevard County Clerk of Court
(321) 637-5413 Ext: 49446
Fax: (321) 264-5228
summer.nix@brevardclerk.us

From: “Mitch Needelman”
Date: June 19, 2012 9:49:35 PM EDT
To:
Cc: , “FL_GOV Inspector General” , “Tampa Division” , , “ASKDOJ” , , , “Summer Nix” , “Charlene Amos” , “Kim Booth”
Subject: FW: Notice of Collection from PennCredit collection, addressed to Susan Schoof

Greetings Ms. Chandler:

Thank you for contacting the office of Mitch Needelman, Brevard County Clerk of Courts. The Clerk appreciates your concerns and asked me to respond on his behalf.

Please note I am including the Compliance and Collections Staff on this email. Someone will review your case and contact you soon.

Again, thank you for contacting the office of Mitch Needelman, Clerk.

Have a wonderful day!

Many Thanks,
Renee’ McGrory
Executive Assistant to
Mitch Needelman, Clerk

“Our mission is to provide superior customer service to all those we serve. As a Public Trustee, the Clerk will diligently perform the duties and functions of this office, always keeping a focus on the rights of the individual citizen.” ~~Taylor Sakuma

From: Susan Chandler
Date: June 16, 2012 4:30:46 PM EDT
To: Mitch.Needelman@brevardclerk.us
Cc: Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com, FL_GOV Inspector General , Tampa Division , miami@ic.fbi.gov, ASKDOJ , darren_achord@rubio.senate.gov, jennifer_solomon@billnelson.senate.gov
Subject: Notice of Collection from PennCredit collection, addressed to Susan Schoof

The Honorable Mitch Needelman
Brevard County Clerk of the Court
700 S Park Avenue
Titusville, FL 32780-4015

Dear Mr. Needelman,

I am writing in regards to a Notice of Collection from PennCredit recevied today seeking payment of $140 in overdue court costs.

The balance of my sole account with the Brevard County Clerk of Court was adjusted to zero years ago, when I pointed out that I had been billed separately by the Clerk for the same amount on the same day, once as Susan Schoof, once as Susan Chandler.

The adjustment and zero balance is borne out by your eFACT’s website at the very bottom of the pdf’d page below.

At the time this suit was filed, Florida was the only state in the union charging court fees to declare indigence, and not a nominal sum … it was $50.

If I had had the $50 to make it of record that I did not have $50, I would have never owed the court a cent in connection with the case. The heinousness of charging fees to declare indigence was compounded by the courts not retaining the fees in full – part of the proceeds went to the state, which made indigence fees a backdoor tax on Florida’s most vulnerable populations. I strenuously objected to indigence fees and other court fee/backdoor taxes to Governor Crist via email, copying my representatives. It is my understanding that indigence fees are no longer collected.

Nowhere on the pdf’d eFACT document below does the amount of $140 show.

The eFACTS site also accurately reflects that my name is Susan Chandler, not Susan Schoof, and that I changed my address in a timely manner. Twice.

Notifications of any indebtedness could and should have been sent to me prior to engaging a collection agency.

Because the amount of $140 does not show in your records, and because my name is not Schoof, and because your office has continually known my whereabouts and made no contact regarding allegedly years-old indebtedness, it appears that indebtedness was randomly invented for purposes of harassment, likely in response for my advocacy for incarcerated innocents that began of record with Governor Bush before Wilton Dedge’s 2004 exoneration and will continue until every last frame-up I’m aware of is undone.

Engaging an out-of-state firm to participate in apparent retaliatory harassment may have increased the seriousness of its nature.

On July 5, 2011, I sent you an email that included the following: “Sir, if you can comprehend that it’s homicidal to slip a fragile diabetic a sugar-filled rather than sugar-free Coke, and homicidal to run through a coronary intensive care unit screaming “bomb!” at the top of your lungs when there isn’t one, then you have sufficient intellect to understand that it’s homicidal to heap deliberate duress on someone with epilepsy.” The subject of that email was, “Again … Gary Stanley Bennett is alive, his case file should be, too [05-1983-CF--2375-AXXX-XX].”

Both Bennett and I have volatile epilepsy, and are subject to stress-engendered, life-threatening seizures. Just as your office’s temporarily burying Bennett’s record was stressful for him on top of his 28 year-long wrongful incarceration, it is stressful for me to be addressed by Schoof, reminding me that Terence Schoof’s 2001 false police report clarified his intention of making me a Jane Doe in a coroners office, an intention that likely still consumes him, given that his frauds and perjuries remain clear, including the perjuries attributing authorship of the police report to a Melbourne PD officer, although in Schoof’s handwriting. If I wake up with bruised knees and another broken tooth tomorrow because of a nocturnal seizure, it will be from receipt of PennCredit’s Notice of Collection and nothing else. If I don’t wake up ever again because of a nocturnal seizure, it will be from receipt of Penn Credit’s Notice of Collection and nothing else.

I therefore trust that you will immediately notify PennCredit that there is no Susan Schoof and no $140 debt, and request that they notify me by email that they have adjusted their records accordingly. If this is not a singular “error,” and others owing the court nothing have heard from PennCredit, I trust that you will make sure that they, too, are promptly notified that corrections have been made.

Sincerely,

Susan Chandler

P.S. directed to the Cc:d parties:

I have written to Florida Attorney General Bondi and asked her to fulfill her campaign promise to investigate all Florida convictions achieved using dog handler John Preston. The FBI and DoJ should concurrently investigate dog handler convictions achieved using handlers now known to be charlatans, including Preston, Keith Pikett and others that the FBI or other federal agencies used.

In the meantime, Gary Bennett should be released on recognizance pending full pardon. There is likely no dog handler frame-up more obvious than his, achieved one full year after Preston was found a fraud in Dale Sutton’s Ohio federal case.

A January 30, 1984 Sentinel article about Bennett, “Legal foes differ on value of dog’s nose,” copied below, misstates the date of Sutton’s conviction and obscures the fact that Preston was definitively found a fraud in December of 1982, with Sutton released in January of 1983.

In later issuing an opinion on Sutton’s request for damages, the federal court stated, “Sutton alleges, and the government does not now contest, that during the course of Sutton’s trial Preston testified untruthfully as to his credentials, background, and training, and as to the abilities and ancestry of his German shepherd, Harass II.”

That single sentence obliges you all to get very busy, very fast.

November 8, 2006

The Honorable Chief Justice Fred Lewis
500 South Duval Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1925

Re: 05-2004-DR-006668, 05-2001-MM-057988 Brevard 18th Circuit
56-2006-CA-52, St. Lucie 19th Circuit

Dear Justice Lewis:

I read a September 10th St. Petersburg Times editorial that addressed your dismay over court practices in some districts and detailed some of the actions you took to correct what you had discovered. Because what I have encountered may be germane to the issues in that editorial, I write to request that you have someone from your office obtain and read the records for the above cases, obtaining related Melbourne and Palm Bay police reports, and comparing sentencing in 2001-MM-057988 to others arrested in the sting.

Your website says that you cannot discuss these matters with me and can only accept comments. My comments to support the reasons for your office to expend the effort and expense of reviewing the above cases include:

1. Expectation of having safe, uninterrupted possession of one’s home, papers, and personal possessions is reasonable under the 14th Amendment.

2. Expectation of being protected from undue stress, when afflicted by a stress disorder, is reasonable under the ADA.

3. Expectation of being protected from theft, perjury, obstruction, abuse of process and deliberate duress is reasonable under existing Florida statutes.

4. Expectation of equitable distribution of martial assets is reasonable under existing Florida statutes.

5. Expectation of attorney candor before the Court is reasonable under Florida Bar Ethics Codes.

6. Expectation of candor from the Court is reasonable under Florida Judicial Canons.

Please act with haste if you can and will; I am about to become a homeless homeowner again, on October 31st. If you need any additional information from me, please request it via email at studio8@infionline.net. I have difficulty following and participating in conversation under stress. Thank you.

Respectfully,

Susan Chandler
flight residence: 321 Monarch Lane, Fort Pierce, FL 34946 – (772) 468-8765
legal residence: 1223 Rivermont Drive, Melbourne, FL 32935

About these ads

About Susan Chandler

Now-disabled interior/exterior designer dragged into battling conviction corruption from its periphery in a third personal battle with civil public corruption.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Needelman needles me back … part deux

  1. Logic confuses people. Especially bean counters on the public dole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s